ss_blog_claim=68f2b9da6db9a7f8e3995c4d1915363a

RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Albuquerque HEART Ordinance

Shadrach the chagrined Neo Mastiff

Sometimes I’m just too ashamed to say I live here in this city. I don’t know how people can’t see through this ploy by animal rightists but then they’ve been VERY effective at pulling the proverbial wool over most animal loving folks’ head. Sure we need to control pet overpopulation but not at the expense of our bad health by spaying and neutering us too young. And not at the expense of the good and reputable breeders. And not at the expense of losing our rights and freedoms because there are bad apples in every bunch. Remember with freedom comes responsibility and it does come at a price bepaws freedom ain’t free. Grrrr, just wake up out of the matrix okay??? Here is the help we need:

As Patte Klecan and I outlined at the caucus and the delegates meeting in Newark, the Albuquerque City Council has passed what many consider to be one of the most onerous and dangerous anti-breeding laws ever to come along. Known as the HEART (Humane and Ethical Animal Regulations and Treatment) ordinance, the law would limit the number of intact dogs that a household may keep to four, impose an annual $150 per dog intact companion animal fee, and abolish hobby breeder permits that have been in effect for decades. That’s just a few of its most objectionable provisions.

The ordinance also trivializes animal cruelty to the extent that one could easily face animal cruelty charges for many commonly accepted practices, and it is written so poorly that in many cases it is difficult to figure out just what it says. What’s more, it has animal rights fingerprints all over it. For anybody who wishes to read this manifesto in its abominable entirety, it can be accessed at http://daystar2.cabq.gov:81/Attachments/4333.doc.

The Rio Grande Kennel Club and members of the fancy worked tirelessly to prevent this legislation from passing. We tried talking to the sponsor (she wouldn’t listen to us), we tried talking to the mayor (he double-crossed us), and we finally took our case to the city council. Despite a tremendous turnout and testimony running more than 2 to 1 against the ordinance, the political “fix” was in and the ordinance passed on a 6 to 3 vote.

We are now seeking relief from the judiciary. The Rio Grande Kennel Club and eight individual plaintiffs have filed suit against the City of Albuquerque in New Mexico District Court, 2nd Judicial District. We are currently awaiting a decision on our request for a preliminary injunction (the hearing was held Monday), but whatever the judge’s decision on that, we have every intention of pursuing the matter to trial.

There is strong evidence to indicate that Albuquerque was targeted for this ordinance and that its proponents will consider success here as their “foot in the door” for similar legislation elsewhere. A victory in Albuquerque will only strengthen their position when they push for similar legislation in other communities. That is why we are asking for financial help in our fight against the ordinance, not only for the benefit of fanciers in the Albuquerque area, but also for the benefit of the fancy nationwide. If we can stop HEART here, that will provide valuable precedent for future battles.

Donations can be sent to: RGKC Legal Fund; P.O. Box 25672; Albuquerque, NM 87125-5672. Please make checks payable to Rio Grande Kennel Club.

Permission to cross-post as widely as possible is given.

Bill Green, Delegate
Rio Grande KC

Update:
Animal Opponents Fail in Recall Attempt and Repeal of HEART Ordinance
[July 21, 2006] For the second time in a row, dog breeders battling the new HEART Ordinance have come up empty-handed. Last week, they fell short in their attempt to force a recall of Councilor Sally Mayer, the author and tireless champion of the ordinance. In fact, they turned in no petitions at all by the deadline of July 14th.
The coalition then sought a repeal of the ordinance itself, but according to a story in the Albuquerque Tribune, they again failed to submit the required number of signatures by last night’s deadline. KRQE reports that Ron Gustafson, the Valencia County breeder leading the anti-HEART effort, “puts the blame on the city claiming the clerk failed to properly notify the public of locations to sign the petition.” The ordinance, designed to crack down on animal abuse and overbreeding, was signed into law by Mayor Chavez last month, and will go into effect in October 10 of 2006.

Unfortunately this HEART Ordinance smacks all over the place of animal rightists junk and the politicians are being used for their agenda. This only punishes the ethical, reputable breeders and is a first step in ending domestic animals altogether…too bad the politicians can’t see beyond their re-election campaigns.

Have a pawsitively tail waggin’, H.E.A.R.T.-free, REAL animal love day, WOOF!

Bark ‘N’ Blog is brought to you by Aspenbloom Natural Pet Care

Trackback URL

  1. 7 Comment(s)

  2. By Ruth Cooke on Nov 11, 2006 | Reply

    Can you please email the addy to
    bring up the HEART “masterpiece”
    and maybe print it out? I can’t
    make the site address you supplied
    work, and three others in the past
    have not worked either.
    After I can read and hopefully prit
    it in it’s entireity, I will be
    back to you.
    Thank you.
    Velveteendragon@aol.com

  3. By Jaime Marcus on Apr 14, 2007 | Reply

    No one allowed us to vote on whether or not we wanted to microchip our pets. All of a sudden, it’s a law. It goes against what most of us believe, and I for one will not put a microchip in anyliving thing. It’s a nazi tactic and has nothing to do with health and safety; it’s about power and control.

  4. By Shadrach on Apr 14, 2007 | Reply

    Amen Jaime, we agree! It is a nazi tactic and there is also proof that microchipping can harm and potentially cause cancer at the injection site. Here is some info I have on my website and also another place you can visit for more info on microchips:

    1. Noble Leon

    2. To Microchip or Not: That IS the Question

    Have a tail waggin’ day!
    Kim & Shadrach

  5. By Holly on Sep 10, 2007 | Reply

    Are there any anti microchip groups in Albuquerque that are trying to get this silly ordinence changed, because i recently just moved to new mexico and am disgusted and outraged that i should have to do something so unethical to my dog.
    zerosum_@hotmail.com

  6. By Shadrach on Sep 10, 2007 | Reply

    Hi Holly,
    Good question. Here is a show we did on Animal Talk Naturally with Ron
    Gustafson who is actively fighting this HEART Ordinance here in Albuquerque:
    http://www.animaltalknaturally.com/2007/03/04/special-edition-a-bridge-of-hope-show-82/

    His website is:
    http://www.icare-usa.org/

    It is disgusting Holly, too bad people think this will help our pets instead
    of harm them. I wrote an article on this here:
    http://aspenbloompetcare.com/2007/08/to-microchip-or-not-to-microchip.htm

    Kim Bloomer

  7. By Ratna Ralkowski on Jan 4, 2008 | Reply

    I just learned today (after retrieving my cat from a trap that a neighbor rented from the city!) that the HEART Ordinance also mandates that all dogs, cats, and ferrets must be on a leash when off the owner’s property.

    This is devastating news to me because my cat LOVES to go outside every day for a few hours.

    I know that indoor cats live longer… but I have a hard time believing that the quality of my cat’s life wouldn’t be hindered if I forced her to stay inside. (And, it’s a minority of cats who will let themselves be subjected to a leash.)

    I was reluctant to microchip my cat, but did. This leash law, however, seems to go way too far (in addition to enabling hostile neighbors).

    It seems completely reasonable for spayed/neutered and licensed pet cats to be allowed to roam freely.

    Is there still an active movement to rescind/amend the HEART Ordinance?

  8. By Shadrach on Jan 4, 2008 | Reply

    Hi Ratna,
    I know it’s not natural for a cat to held captive indoors all the time and certainly not on a leash. You just can’t mandate certain things and certainly not responsibility. You sound as though you’re a very caring person who wants to do the right thing.

    I don’t know if there is still a movement to rescind it but I am betting there is. You can contact either the Rio Grande Kennel Club or Ron Gustafson.

    Here is their contact info:
    Ron Gustafson
    http://www.icare-usa.org/

    Patte Klecan, Legislative Liaison for Rio Grande KC BEDRCKBOUV@aol.com

  1. 3 Trackback(s)

  2. Oct 17, 2006: Aspenbloom Pet Care » Blog Archive » PetPawrri 3: Free to Be on Animal Talk Naturally!
  3. Jan 1, 2007: Aspenbloom Pet Care » And they’re off…or not
  4. Mar 4, 2007: Aspenbloom Pet Care » A Bridge of Hope on ATN

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.