Dog Lovers Footing the Bill on Rabies Challenge Study
By Shadrach on Feb 16, 2008 in Animal Talk, Naturally!, Dog & Cat Vaccinations
Yes indeed it is the humans who love us dogs who want to see this challenge study to completion bepaws once the study PROVES that we don’t need these annual or even three-year rabies shots THEN many dogs lives will be saved from the harm of overvaccinating, WOOF! The Rabies Challenge Fund sure doesn’t have government support but it has dog lover support - and that’s the BEST kind, WOOF!
USDA Forces Dog Lovers to Foot the Bill of Rabies Study
Why Vaccines Aren’t Safe
Private Study Links Vaccinations to Neurological Disorders
Man in Vietnam Quadraplegic After Rabies Vaccine
Here is one of the shows we’ve done with The Rabies Challenge Fund on Animal Talk Naturally. Look for the Rabies Challenge Fund to be our guest once again on Animal Talk Naturally July 30th at 2:30 PM Eastern on Blog Talk Radio:
The Vaccine Challenge - Show #91
Here is an update from Kris Christine of the Rabies Challenge Fund:
The Director of Animal Welfare, Norma Worley, is trying to change the rabies immunization requirement for puppies from 6 months to 3 months despite the fact that Maine hasn’t had a documented case of a rabid dog since 2003 and there have only been 5 documented cases since 1994 (14 years), and none of them were noted as being puppies.
Please read the testimony I presented in opposition to Section 7 of LD 2171 at yesterday’s hearing before Maine’s Agriculture Committee. If you are concerned about this and wish to voice your opposition, PLEASE e-MAIL THE COMMITTEE members by cutting and pasting their addresses below and putting something like Oppose LD 2171 Section 7 in your subject line.
The committee wants to hear from the dog-owning public, and if it doesn’t, you may end up being required to add a rabies vaccine into the mix of puppyhood shots (distemper, hepatitis, parvo, etc..) that are being administered at that age.
PERMISSION IS GRANTED TO POST AND CROSS-POST THIS MESSAGE!
Kris L. Christine
Below is a copy of the testimony I will present today.
Regards, Kris L. Christine
February 11, 2008
TO: The Agriculture, Conservation and Forest Committee
RE: LD 2171, An Act To Amend the Animal Welfare Laws
My name is Kris Christine and I live with my family in Alna, Maine. I am the Founder and Co-Trustee of The Rabies Challenge Fund (RCF). My colleagues — Dr. W. Jean Dodds of Hemopet, Co-Trustee of th RCF and Dr. Ronald Schultz of The University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine, currently conducting 5 & 7 year rabies challenge studies for the RCF — are the world’s two leading veterinary vaccine research scientists.
I am here to testify against Sec. 7. 7 MRSA §3916, sub-§1-A of LD 2171, which would amend the law to require that puppies be
vaccinated against rabies at 3 months of age rather than 6.
There is no scientific or epidemiological data justifying amendment of this law as there has been no increase in rabies in puppies under the age of 6 months in the State of Maine. Dr. Donald Hoenig, Maine’s State Public Health Veterinarian, told me on Wednesday, February 6th that “The last case of canine rabies in Maine was in 2003…….there have only been 5 cases of canine rabies in the past 14 years in Maine…Cases of canine rabies are EXTREMELY UNUSUAL.”
Five cases of rabies in dogs since 1994 (no mention was made of these cases being puppies under 6 months of age), with the last one being in 2003, evidences the fact that the current law requiring puppies be vaccinated against rabies at 6 months of age is effective at controlling rabies in Maine’s canine community and does not need to be changed.
Vaccinating puppies at too young an age can be ineffective. The 2003 American Animal Hospital Association’s (AAHA) Canine VaccineGuidelines reports on Page 17 (Attachment #1) that: “…when puppies are first vaccinated at 16 weeks of age (an age when passively acquired antibodies generally don’t cause interference), one dose of an MLV vaccine, or two doses of a killed vaccine, are adequate to stimulate an immune response.”
On Page 16 of the 2003 AAHA Guidelines (Attachment #2), it states that: “When vaccinating an animal, the age of the animal, the animal’s immune status, and interference by maternal antibodies in the development of immunity must be considered. Research has demonstrated that the presence of passively acquired maternal antibodies interferes with the immune response to many canine vaccines, including CPV, CDV, CAV-2 and rabies vaccines.”
The 2006 AAHA Guidelines (Attachment #3), states on Page 13 as the most common reason for vaccination failure that “the puppy has a sufficient amount of passively acquired maternal antibody (PAMA) to block the vaccine……” The older the puppy is when it receives its first rabies vaccination, the more likely it will elicit the desired immunological response - as demonstrated by the extraordinarily low number of canine rabies cases in Maine over a 14 year period under the current 6 month vaccination protocol for puppies.
Rabies, a “killed” vaccine, is the most potent of the veterinary vaccines and is associated with clinically significant adverse reactions — it should only be given when warranted. According to the 2003AAHA Guidelines (Page 16) (Attachment #2), “…killed vaccines are much more likely to cause hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., immune-mediated disease).” Further, the AAHA task force reports on Page 18 (Attachment #4) that, “Bacterial vaccines, especially killed whole organism products …are much more likely to cause adverse reactions than subunit or live bacterial vaccines or MLV vaccines, especially if given topically. Several killed bacterial products are used as immunomodulators/adjuvants. Thus, their presence in a combination vaccine product may enhance or suppress the immune response or may cause an undesired response (e.g., IgE hypersensitivity or a class of antibody that is not protective).”
Adverse reactions such autoimmune diseases affecting the thyroid, joints, blood, eyes, skin, kidney, liver, bowel and central nervous system; anaphylactic shock; aggression; seizures; epilepsy; and fibrosarcomas at injection sites are linked to rabies vaccinations.
In sum, the law, as it currently stands requiring puppies to be vaccinated at 6 months of age is and has been effective at controlling rabies in Maine’s canine population. There is no epidemiological or scientific rationale for changing this law and prematurely exposing puppies to the potentially harmful, sometimes fatal, adverse side affects of the rabies vaccine prior to the age of 6 months.
Respectfully submitted,
Kris L. Christine
Founder, Co-Trustee
THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND
www.RabiesChallengeFund.org
________________________________________
And more…
PERMISSION GRANTED TO CROSS-POST THIS MESSAGE.
Vaccines are intended to be administered to HEALTHY dogs — it is an advisory issued on vaccine labels, in veterinary literature and guidelines, as a dog’s health status can have an impact on a vaccine’s effectiveness and fail to elicit an immune response. Startlingly, the AAHA task force indicates (see quote below) that vaccination in a “severely immunosuppressed” dog can result in the dog acquiring the disease it is being vaccinated to prevent.
On Page 24 of the 2006 American Animal Hospital Association’s Canine Vaccine Guidelines, its states under the “Sick Dogs” heading that: “As with pregnant dogs, veterinary medicine has advised against vaccination during illness, due to concerns about suboptimal sero-conversion, or worse, conversion of vaccine to disease.” In other words, if you vaccinate a pregnant or sick dog, not only do you run the risk of a less-than-desirable immunological response, but you run the risk of your dog contracting the disease it is being vaccinated against.
Under the “Immunological Factors Determining Vaccine Safety” column on page 16 of the American Animal Hospital Association’s 2003 Canine Vaccine Guidelines it is written that: ” …an attenuated pathogen in a host which is severely immunosuppressed, or genetically more susceptible, may result in the vaccine causing the disease for which it was designed to prevent.”
Further on that page, under “The Immune System and Frequency of Revaccination,” it cautions that:
“When vaccinating an animal, the age of the animal, the animal’s immune status, and interference by maternal antibodies in the development of immunity must be considered. Research has demonstrated that the presence of passively acquired maternal antibodies significantly interferes with the immuneresponse to many canine vaccines, including CPV [parvo], CDV [distemper], CAV-2 [hepatitis] and rabies vaccines.”
The Merial Imrab 3 vaccine label for dogs and cats, click here:
_http://merialusa.naccvp.com/prodlist…country&p=msds_
(http://merialusa.naccvp.com/prodlist.php?mannum=1111&u=country&p=msds) and then click on IMRAB 3, then on
“label”: “INDICATIONS: IMRAB® 3 is recommended for the vaccination of healthy cats, dogs,sheep, cattle, horses, and ferrets 12 weeks of age and older for prevention of disease due to rabies virus.”
For Rabvac 3 (http://wyethc.naccvp.com/view.php?prodnum=1157122&u=country&p=msds)
click on “label” “Rabvac 3 is a killed virus vaccine for the vaccination of healthy dogs, cats and horses against rabies.”
This link (http://www.knowbetterdogfood.com/dogcare/health/vaccinations.php)
will take you to an article by Dr. Moira Drosdovech entitled Pet Vaccinations - A Time for Change, in which she states what all the
veterinary medical schools and vaccine companies declare, that: “Although I have stated this in previous articles, I cannot emphasize enough that any pet receiving a vaccination should be 100% healthy. This excludes vaccinating pets with any health problems whatsoever, including diseases in “remission” such as skin diseases, cancer, thyroid problems, to name a few, and especially not those with a history of autoimmune disease. Please understand that you are not benefiting your pet at all by vaccinating while unhealthy.”
If anyone would like copies of the American Animal Hospital Association’s Canine Vaccine Guidelines, the 1992 French challenge study demonstrating that dogs were immune to a rabies challenge 5 years after vaccination, the 2003 Italian study documenting fibrosarcomas at the presumed injection sites of rabies vaccines in dogs, as well as Dr. W. Jean Dodds’ papers on vaccinal adverse reactions, please e-mail me ledgespring@lincoln.midcoast.com .
The 2003 American Animal Hospital Association’s Canine Vaccine Guidelines are accessible online at
(http://www.leerburg.com/special_report.htm) .
The 2006 American Animal Hospital Association’s Canine Vaccine Guidelines are downloadable in PDF format at
(http://www.aahanet.org/PublicDocumen…s06Revised.pdf) .
________________________________________________
Have a pawsitively tail waggin’, vaccine-free day, WOOF!
Bark ‘N’ Blog is brought to you by Aspenbloom Natural Pet Care

















RSS feed













